Carbon Removal Offsets Explained: All You Need to Know
Impactful Ninja is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.
Learn more
Learn more
.
Hey fellow impactful ninja ? You may have noticed that Impactful Ninja is all about providing helpful information to make a positive impact on the world and society. And that we love to link back to where we found all the information for each of our posts. Most of these links are informational-based for you to check out their primary sources with one click. But some of these links are so-called "affiliate links" to products that we recommend. First and foremost, because we believe that they add value to you. For example, when we wrote a post about the environmental impact of long showers, we came across an EPA recommendation to use WaterSense showerheads. So we linked to where you can find them. Or, for many of our posts, we also link to our favorite books on that topic so that you can get a much more holistic overview than one single blog post could provide. And when there is an affiliate program for these products, we sign up for it. For example, as Amazon Associates, we earn from qualifying purchases. First, and most importantly, we still only recommend products that we believe add value for you. When you buy something through one of our affiliate links, we may earn a small commission - but at no additional costs to you. And when you buy something through a link that is not an affiliate link, we won’t receive any commission but we’ll still be happy to have helped you. When we find products that we believe add value to you and the seller has an affiliate program, we sign up for it. When you buy something through one of our affiliate links, we may earn a small commission (at no extra costs to you). And at this point in time, all money is reinvested in sharing the most helpful content with you. This includes all operating costs for running this site and the content creation itself. You may have noticed by the way Impactful Ninja is operated that money is not the driving factor behind it. It is a passion project of mine and I love to share helpful information with you to make a positive impact on the world and society. However, it's a project in that I invest a lot of time and also quite some money. Eventually, my dream is to one day turn this passion project into my full-time job and provide even more helpful information. But that's still a long time to go. Stay impactful,Affiliate Disclosure
Why do we add these product links?
What do these affiliate links mean for you?
What do these affiliate links mean for us?
What does this mean for me personally?
One way to reduce human-derived atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions is via carbon removal, or the technological or natural elimination of carbon. Partnered with carbon offsets, carbon removal could have a greater impact. So, we had to ask: What are carbon removal offsets really, and could they help us mitigate climate change?
Carbon removal offsets are a specific type of carbon offsets that eliminate atmospheric carbon via technological or natural processes. Removal projects involving direct air capture, carbon mineralization, reforestation, afforestation, blue carbon, and agriculture pull carbon directly out of the air.
Keep reading to find out all about what carbon removal offsets are, how they work, how effective and efficient they are, what their pros and cons are, and what the best ones are. At the end of the article, we’ll also share with you how carbon removal offsets can help mitigate climate change and what better alternatives to them are.
The Big Picture of Carbon Removal Offsets
Carbon offsets are reductions in carbon emissions that are used to compensate for carbon emissions occurring elsewhere. They are measured in tons of carbon dioxide (CO2) equivalents and are bought and sold through international brokers, online retailers, and trading platforms on what is known as the global carbon offset market.
“Carbon Offset: a way for a company or person to reduce the level of carbon dioxide for which they are responsible by paying money to a company that works to reduce the total amount produced in the world, for example by reforestation”
Oxford Dictionary
Carbon removal is the process of eliminating carbon from the atmosphere. It is one way to mitigate the adverse effects of CO2 emissions that occur once they enter our atmosphere.
“Carbon Removal: the process of removing CO2 from the atmosphere”
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
Carbon removal solutions include both technological and natural ones, with trees and direct air capture being two of the most common strategies utilized.
What are carbon removal offsets | Carbon removal offsets are a specific type of carbon offset that focuses on eliminating carbon from the atmosphere via technological or natural processes. |
How do carbon removal offsets work | Carbon removal projects reduce CO2 emissions by supporting projects that pull CO2 emissions out of the air. |
How effective and efficient are carbon removal offsets | Effectiveness: carbon removal offsets can permanently remove carbon from the atmosphere, remove those emissions quickly, and reinforce our carbon sinks, depending on the type of removal. However, they can negatively alter ecosystems, can be difficult to monitor and verify, and do not reduce your own carbon emissions, which can lead to greenwashing. Efficiency: Carbon removal offsets can continue to remove carbon emissions after their project lifespan and have low rates of carbon re-emission, depending on the type of removal. However, they may also lack permanence, may not yet be scaled to compensate for our global emissions, and have varying costs. |
What are the 6 pros of carbon removal offsets | 1. Carbon removal offsets can be permanent 2. Carbon removal offsets can reduce CO2 and CH4 emissions quickly 3. Carbon removal offsets can be cost-effective 4. Carbon removal offsets can reinforce our carbon sinks 5. Carbon removal offsets can have low rates of carbon re-emission 6. Carbon removal offsets allow us to reduce carbon emissions in ways we wouldn’t be able to accomplish individually |
What are the 6 cons of carbon removal offsets | 1. Carbon removal offsets can lack permanence 2. Carbon removal offsets can be relatively expensive 3. Carbon removal offsets may not yet be scaled to compensate for our global emissions 4. Carbon removal offsets can negatively alter ecosystems 5. Carbon removal offsets can be difficult to standardize, verify, and monitor 6. Carbon removal offsets do not reduce your own carbon emissions |
What are the best carbon removal offsets | The best agricultural carbon offsets are offered by Climeworks, Neustark, The Arbor Day Foundation, Sea Trees, and Native Energy, which involve direct carbon capture, carbon mineralization, reforestation, afforestation, blue carbon, and agriculture. |
How can carbon removal offsets help mitigate climate change | Carbon removal can help mitigate climate change as it eliminates atmospheric carbon, which when emitted, can remain in our atmosphere for a long period of time. |
What Are Carbon Removal Offsets
Carbon removal is the process of eliminating carbon from the atmosphere. It is also referred to as negative emissions or carbon drawdown.
“Carbon Removal: the process of removing CO2 from the atmosphere”
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
Some of the most common carbon removal offset projects include:
How Do Carbon Removal Offsets Work
Carbon removal projects reduce CO2 emissions by supporting projects that capture and remove CO2 that has already been emitted into our atmosphere.
Carbon removal can be split into 2 categories, technological and natural carbon removal.
- Technological carbon removal: This involves specialized technology which extracts carbon from the atmosphere.
- Natural carbon removal: Also known as carbon sequestration. Carbon is stored naturally in vegetation (forests), soils, and oceans, also referred to as our carbon sinks.
How Effective and Efficient Are Carbon Removal Offsets
In terms of effectiveness, carbon removal offsets can permanently remove carbon from the atmosphere, remove those emissions quickly, and reinforce our carbon sinks, depending on the type of removal. However, they can negatively alter ecosystems, can be difficult to monitor and verify, and do not reduce your own carbon emissions, which can lead to greenwashing.
In terms of efficiency, carbon removal offsets can continue to remove carbon emissions after their project lifespan and have low rates of carbon re-emission, depending on the type of removal. However, they may also lack permanence, may not yet be scaled to compensate for our global emissions, and have varying costs.
Carbon removal offsets are effective at mitigating climate change because they:
- Direct carbon/air capture (DCC/DAC), carbon mineralization, and biochar offsets remove carbon from the atmosphere and store it permanently in underground geological reservoirs.
- DCC/DAC, carbon mineralization, and some blue carbon and agricultural offsets reduce emissions quicker than other nature-based solutions.
- Nature-based solutions such as reforestation, afforestation, blue carbon, and agroforestry store carbon in forests, soils, and oceans, commonly called our carbon sinks.
However, carbon removal offsets can also lack effectiveness because afforestation and carbon mineralization can negatively alter ecosystems if not planned properly, and blue carbon and agricultural carbon offsets can be difficult to standardize, verify, and monitor.
Carbon removal offsets are efficient at reducing CO2 emissions because they:
- Trees continue absorbing carbon long after they mature, which means reforestation, afforestation, and mangrove blue carbon projects can continue to reduce carbon emissions long after the trees have been planted.
- DCC/DAC offsets can have low rates of carbon re-emission when plants are operated by low-carbon electricity. And carbon mineralization offsets store carbon permanently, even if rocks are broken.
However, carbon removal offsets can also lack efficiency because:
- Nature-based carbon removal solutions such as reforestation, afforestation, blue carbon, and agroforestry can lack permanence because carbon storage is reversible.
- DCC/DAC, carbon mineralization, blue carbon, and agricultural offsets are not scaled enough to keep pace with our global carbon emissions due to a lack of technology and few companies engaged in the practices.
Also, costs can vary greatly depending on the type of removal. Carbon removal offsets such as DCC/DAC and carbon mineralization are some of the more expensive methods of carbon removal. But carbon removal offsets involving reforestation, afforestation, blue carbon, and agriculture are relatively cost-effective.
Lastly, carbon removal offsets can also lack effectiveness because they do not reduce your own carbon emissions, which can lead to greenwashing. This occurs when emissions are only offset and not reduced from the source, and the consumer is deceived into thinking they are offsetting their emissions but in reality, they are not.
What Are The 6 Pros and 6 Cons of Carbon Removal Offsets
Carbon removal offsets can be permanent, immediate, cost-effective, have low rates of carbon re-emission, and reinforce our carbon sinks, depending on the specific type of offset. They also allow us to reduce carbon emissions in ways we wouldn’t be able to accomplish individually.
Carbon removal offsets can lack permanence, can be relatively expensive, can negatively alter ecosystems and be difficult to monitor and verify, and may not be scaled to compensate for our global emissions, depending on the specific type of offset. They also do not reduce your own carbon emissions, which can lead to greenwashing.
What Are the 6 Pros of Carbon Removal Offsets
Carbon removal offsets have various pros that make them effective at reducing carbon emissions.
6 Pros of Carbon Removal Offsets | Quick Facts |
#1: Carbon removal offsets can be permanent | Carbon removal offsets such as direct carbon/air capture (DCC/DAC), carbon mineralization, and biochar agricultural offsets can permanently remove carbon from the atmosphere. |
#2: Carbon removal offsets can reduce CO2 and CH4 emissions quickly | Carbon removal offsets such as DCC/DAC, carbon mineralization, and some agricultural offsets reduce emissions quicker than other nature-based solutions. |
#3: Carbon removal offsets can be cost-effective | Carbon removal offsets involving reforestation, afforestation, blue carbon, and agriculture are some of the most cost-effective methods of carbon emission reduction. |
#4: Carbon removal offsets can reinforce our carbon sinks | Carbon removal offsets involving reforestation, afforestation, blue carbon, and agriculture reinforce our terrestrial and marine carbon sinks. |
#5: Carbon removal offsets can have low rates of carbon re-emission | Carbon removal offsets involving DCC/DAC, carbon mineralization, and biochar have a low rate of carbon re-emission, making them effective at removing carbon. |
#6: Carbon removal offsets allow us to reduce carbon emissions in ways we wouldn’t be able to accomplish individually | Carbon removal offsets allow us to reduce emissions from activities where sustainable alternatives are not yet widely available. |
What Are the 6 Cons of Carbon Removal Offsets
Understanding the drawbacks of carbon removal offsets is important in order to effectively mitigate climate change.
6 Cons of Carbon Removal Offsets | Quick Facts |
#1: Carbon removal offsets can lack permanence | Carbon removal offsets involving reforestation, afforestation, blue carbon, and agroforestry can lack permanence because they are reversible, nature-based solutions. |
#2: Carbon removal offsets can be relatively expensive | Carbon removal offsets such as DCC/DAC and carbon mineralization offsets are some of the most expensive methods of carbon removal. |
#3: Carbon removal offsets can be difficult to standardize, verify, and monitor | Blue carbon and agricultural offsets can be difficult to standardize, verify, and monitor because there are multiple methodologies and governing companies. |
#4: Carbon removal offsets can negatively alter ecosystems | Carbon removal offsets such as afforestation and carbon mineralization can negatively alter ecosystems if not planned properly. |
#5: Carbon removal offsets may not yet be scaled to compensate for our global emissions | Carbon removal offsets involving DCC/DAC, carbon mineralization, blue carbon, and agriculture are not yet at a scale where they can compensate for our global carbon emissions. |
#6: Carbon removal offsets do not reduce your own carbon emissions | If emissions are only offset and not reduced from the source, this could lead to greenwashing, when the consumer is deceived into thinking they are offsetting their emissions but in reality, they are not. |
How Could You Offset Your Own Carbon Footprint With Carbon Removal Offsets
The market for carbon offsets was small in the year 2000, but by 2010 it had already grown to represent nearly $10 billion worldwide. The voluntary carbon offset market (VCM) is where everyday consumers can purchase carbon offsets to offset their carbon emissions.
The Ecosystem Marketplace predicts the VCM can grow to $50B by the year 2050. And because carbon removal offsets are effective and efficient at reducing carbon emissions, they are predicted to make up an increasingly larger share of this market.
Carbon Removal Offset Company | Quick Facts |
Climeworks | About: Carbon offset purchases support the practice of direct CO2 removal, where specialized machines remove CO2 directly from the air and store it in rock formations underground. Costs: $1.20 per 1kg of CO2 |
Neustark | About: Neustark removes CO2 from the atmosphere and stores it in recycled concrete, and they cut new CO2 emissions by reducing the use of traditional cement. Costs: Costs are determined after initial contact. |
The Arbor Day Foundation | About: Carbon offset purchases support afforestation (and reforestation) projects in the Mississippi Alluvial Valley (US), Nicaragua, and Peru. Costs: $40 per 1,000kg of CO2 |
SeaTrees | About: Carbon offset purchases support coral reef/kelp forest/watershed restoration as well as mangrove tree planting. Costs: $22 per 1,000kg of CO2 |
Native Energy | About: Native Energy offers a variety of regenerative agriculture carbon offset projects including avoided grassland conversion, farm methane, and soil carbon. Costs: Costs are determined after initial contact. |
Novocarbo | About: Novocarbo uses pyrogenic carbon capture and storage, which converts CO2 into regenerative energy and biochar. The biochar can be used as soil, as a replacement for cement, and in regenerative agriculture. Costs: Novocarbo uses resellers (e.g., Puro.earth and Carbonfuture), costs are determined with these. |
greenSand | About: greenSand uses Olivine rocks, which trap CO2 when they come into contact with water. For every ton of CO2 purchased, greenSand spreads 1 ton of Olivine, which can in turn absorb and permanently store 1 ton of CO2. Costs: $82 per 1,000kg of CO2 |
Ecologi | About: Carbon offset purchases support third-party certified reforestation/afforestation carbon offset projects including those in Madagascar, Mozambique, Bolivia, Morocco, Senegal, and Uruguay. Costs: $6.04 per 1,000 kg of CO2 offset |
One Tree Planted | About: Carbon offset purchases support reforestation/afforestation projects including those in the US, Romania, Iceland, and Africa. Costs: $20 per 1,000kg of CO2 |
The Ocean Foundation | About: Carbon offset purchases support the SeaGrass Grow, seagrass planting project. Costs: $20 per 1,000kg of CO2 |
Husk | About: Husk converts rice husks into biochar, fertilizers, and biopesticides via smokeless pyrolysis, preventing the re-emission of carbon into the atmosphere. Costs: Husk uses resellers to sell its solutions. Visit Patch’s website to learn more about pricing. |
Vi Agroforestry | About: Vi Agroforestry specializes in poverty reduction and environmental improvement through agroforestry and improved farming practices. Costs: $28 per 1,000kg of CO2 offset |
How Can Carbon Removal Offsets Help Mitigate Climate Change
Climate change is a severe and long-term consequence of fossil fuel combustion. Carbon removal offsets can help mitigate climate change because they eliminate fossil-fuel-derived carbon from our atmosphere which, if left untreated, can remain there for tens of thousands of years and exacerbate the negative effects of climate change.
How is Climate Change Defined
Climate change is arguably the most severe, long-term global impact of fossil fuel combustion. Every year, approximately 33 billion tons (bt) of CO2 are emitted from burning fossil fuels. The carbon found in fossil fuels reacts with oxygen in the air to produce CO2.
“Climate change: changes in the earth’s weather, including changes in temperature, wind patterns and rainfall, especially the increase in the temperature of the earth’s atmosphere that is caused by the increase of particular gasses, especially carbon dioxide.”
Oxford Dictionary
Atmospheric CO2 fuels climate change, which results in global warming. When CO2 and other air pollutants absorb sunlight and solar radiation in the atmosphere, it traps the heat and acts as an insulator for the planet. Since the Industrial Revolution, Earth’s temperature has risen a little more than 1 degree Celsius (C), or 2 degrees Fahrenheit (F). Between 1880-1980 the global temperature rose by 0.07C every 10 years. This rate has more than doubled since 1981, with a current global annual temperature rise of 0.18C, or 0.32F, for every 10 years.
As outlined in the 2015 Paris Climate Agreement, we must cut current GHG emissions by 50% by 2030 and reach net zero by 2050.
How Do Carbon Offsets Generally Help Mitigate Climate Change
Levels of carbon in our atmosphere that cause climate change have increased as a result of human emissions since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution in 1750. The global average concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere today registers at over 400 parts per million. Carbon offsets can help prevent these levels from increasing even more.
When you hear the words “carbon offset”, think about the term “compensation”. Essentially, carbon offsets are removals in GHG emissions that are used to compensate for emissions occurring elsewhere.
Carbon offsets that meet key criteria and verified project standards, are additional and permanent, and are part of projects that are carried out until the end of their lifespan have the best chance of reducing carbon emissions and therefore reducing climate change.
When we offset CO2 we also slow the rate of global temperature rise, which in turn minimizes the effects of climate change.
How Do Carbon Removal Offsets Specifically Help Mitigate Climate Change
Carbon removal in general can specifically help mitigate climate change because it eliminates atmospheric carbon, which when emitted, can remain in our atmosphere for a long period of time.
More specifically, reforestation, afforestation, and mangrove-planting blue carbon offsets help mitigate climate change because they plant more trees, and trees remove CO2 from the air as they grow. By increasing the number of trees on our planet, we increase the amount of carbon they can store. The more carbon our forests can sequester, the less carbon there is in our atmosphere.
Direct carbon/air capture (DCC/DAC) and carbon mineralization offsets specifically help mitigate climate change because these methods permanently lock away CO2 for thousands of years with little to no carbon re-emission.
Agricultural carbon offsets such as biochar, agroforestry, and CH4 capture can specifically help mitigate climate change because they reduce CO2 and CH4 emissions in one of the biggest industries worldwide.
What Are Better Alternatives to Carbon Removal Offsets
If used correctly, carbon removal offsets can provide environmental, economic, and social benefits beyond reducing carbon emissions. They have the potential to instigate meaningful environmental change and begin to reverse some of the effects of climate change.
However, we can’t let this method be a guilt-free way to reduce carbon emissions. Carbon removal offsets must be used in conjunction with direct carbon reduction measures to reduce carbon emissions long term.
These reduction measures don’t have to involve drastic changes either. Actions that may seem small can have a big impact because those small changes add up! You can reduce your carbon footprint in three main areas of your life: household, travel, and lifestyle.
Reduce your household carbon footprint:
- Wash with cold water: Washing clothes in cold water could reduce carbon emissions by up to 11 million tons. Approximately 90% of the energy is used to heat the water, so switching to cold saves also saves energy.
- Replace incandescent bulbs with fluorescent bulbs: Fluorescent bulbs use 75% less energy than incandescent ones, saving energy and thus reducing electricity demand and GHG emissions.
Reduce your travel carbon footprint:
- Fly less: Aviation accounts for around 1.9% of global carbon emissions and 2.5% of CO2. Air crafts run on jet gasoline, which is converted to CO2 when burned.
- Walk or bike when possible: The most efficient ways of traveling are walking, bicycling, or taking the train. Using a bike instead of a car can reduce carbon emissions by 75%. These forms of transportation also provide lower levels of air pollution.
Reduce your lifestyle carbon footprint:
- Switch to renewable energy sources: The six most common types of renewable energy are solar, wind, hydro, tidal, geothermal, and biomass energy. They are a substitute for fossil fuels that can reduce the effects of global warming by limiting global carbon emissions and other pollutants.
- Recycle: Recycling uses less energy and deposits less waste in landfills. Less manufacturing and transportation energy costs means fewer carbon emissions generated. Less waste in landfills means less CH4 is generated.
- Switch from single-use to sustainable products: Reusing products avoids resource extraction, reduces energy use, reduces waste generation, and can prevent littering.
- Eat less meat and dairy: Meat and dairy account for 14.5% of global GHG emissions, with beef and lamb being the most carbon-intensive. Globally, we consume much more meat than is considered sustainable, and switching to a vegan or vegetarian diet could reduce emissions.
- Take shorter showers: Approximately 1.2 trillion gallons of water are used each year in the United States just for showering purposes, and showering takes up about 17% of residential water usage. The amount of water consumed and the energy cost of that consumption are directly related. The less water we use the less energy we use. And the less energy we use, the less of a negative impact we have on the environment.
Because carbon offsets themselves are an indirect way and not a direct way of reducing emissions, they alone will not be enough to reduce global carbon emissions significantly. Direct measures of emission removals, such as reducing individual energy use and consumption, are better alternatives to carbon removal offsets.
Final Thoughts
Carbon removal offsets help reduce carbon emissions by taking carbon directly out of the air. Their effectiveness and efficiency highly depend on the type of sequestration.
Direct carbon/air capture and carbon mineralization offsets permanently remove CO2 quickly with low rates of carbon re-emission. Reforestation, afforestation, blue carbon, and some agricultural offsets reinforce our carbon sinks, reduce emissions after project lifespans, and are cost-effective.
The top carbon removal offsets are those offered by companies whose sequestration projects are verified by recognized standards. But although carbon offsets can instigate meaningful change, they should not be seen as the only solution to climate change. In the long term, they fail to reduce CO2 enough to mitigate climate change for future generations.
When used in conjunction with direct CO2 reduction measures, carbon offsets can be much more effective. We should reduce our own carbon footprint as much as possible first, and only then choose carbon removal offsets.
Stay impactful,
Sources
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Offsets and RECs -What’s the Difference?
- Britannica: Carbon Offset
- David Suzuki Foundation: Are carbon offsets the answer to climate-altering flights?
- American University: What is Carbon Removal?
- Impactful Ninja: What Are Direct Carbon/Air Capture Offsets and How Do They Work
- Impactful Ninja: What Are Carbon Mineralization Offsets and How Do They Work
- Impactful Ninja: What Are Tree Planting Carbon Offsets and How Do They Work
- Impactful Ninja: What Are Afforestation Carbon Offsets and How Do They Work
- Impactful Ninja: What Are Blue Carbon Offsets and How Do They Work
- Impactful Ninja: What Are Agricultural Carbon Offsets and How Do They Work
- South Pole: Carbon Offsets Explained
- Impactful Ninja: What Are Carbon Removal Offsets and How Do They Work? The Big Picture
- Carbfix: Homepage
- Carbfix: Protecting Our Climate by Turning CO2 Into Stone
- ClientEarth: What is a carbon sink?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development: A Global Analysis of the Cost-Efficiency of Forest Carbon Sequestration
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology Climate Portal: Soil-Based Carbon Sequestration
- greenSand: Olivine Research & Evidence
- The Institute for Carbon Removal Law and Policy: Nature-Based Solutions
- American University: Fact Sheet – Enhanced Mineralization
- Edie: Carbon offsetting – How are businesses avoiding greenwashing on the road to net-zero?
- How Effective and Efficient Are Carbon Removal Offsets? Here Are the Facts
- Impactful Ninja: Carbon Removal Offsets: All 6 Pros and 6 Cons Explained
- Carbon Offset Guide: Voluntary Offset Programs
- Ecosystem Marketplace: Voluntary Carbon Markets Top $1 Billion in 2021 with Newly Reported Trades
- Impactful Ninja: Best Carbon Removal Offsets
- Climeworks: Homepage
- Neustark: Homepage
- The Arbor Day Foundation: Homepage
- SeaTrees: Homepage
- Native Energy: Homepage
- Novocarbo: Homepage
- greenSand: Homepage
- Ecologi: Homepage
- One Tree Planted: Homepage
- The Ocean Foundation: Homepage
- Husk: Homepage
- Vi Agroforestry: Homepage
- World Nuclear Association: Carbon Emissions from Electricity
- Natural Resources Defense Council: Global Warming 101
- myclimate: What does “net zero emissions” mean?
- United Nations Convention Framework on Climate Change: The Paris Agreement
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration: Climate Change – Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide
- Terrapass: Carbon Offset Projects
- Carbon Offset Guide: Additionality
- The Ocean Foundation: Reduce Your Carbon Footprint
- Energy Information Administration: Renewable Energy Explained
- Energy Star: Compact Fluorescent Light Bulbs (CFLs) and Mercury
- Our World in Data: Where in the world do people have the highest CO2 emissions from flying?
- Zero Waste Europe: Reusable vs Single Use Packaging
- Carbonbrief: Interactive – What is the climate impact of eating meat and dairy?
- Stop Waste: Recycling and Climate Protection
- Impactful Ninja: Is Taking Long Showers Bad for the Environment?
- United States Environmental Protection Agency: Showerheads
- Impactful Ninja: 4 Main Reasons Why Reducing Your Carbon Footprint is Important