Carbon Sequestration Offsets Explained: All You Need to Know
Impactful Ninja is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.
Learn more
Learn more
.
Hey fellow impactful ninja ? You may have noticed that Impactful Ninja is all about providing helpful information to make a positive impact on the world and society. And that we love to link back to where we found all the information for each of our posts. Most of these links are informational-based for you to check out their primary sources with one click. But some of these links are so-called "affiliate links" to products that we recommend. First and foremost, because we believe that they add value to you. For example, when we wrote a post about the environmental impact of long showers, we came across an EPA recommendation to use WaterSense showerheads. So we linked to where you can find them. Or, for many of our posts, we also link to our favorite books on that topic so that you can get a much more holistic overview than one single blog post could provide. And when there is an affiliate program for these products, we sign up for it. For example, as Amazon Associates, we earn from qualifying purchases. First, and most importantly, we still only recommend products that we believe add value for you. When you buy something through one of our affiliate links, we may earn a small commission - but at no additional costs to you. And when you buy something through a link that is not an affiliate link, we won’t receive any commission but we’ll still be happy to have helped you. When we find products that we believe add value to you and the seller has an affiliate program, we sign up for it. When you buy something through one of our affiliate links, we may earn a small commission (at no extra costs to you). And at this point in time, all money is reinvested in sharing the most helpful content with you. This includes all operating costs for running this site and the content creation itself. You may have noticed by the way Impactful Ninja is operated that money is not the driving factor behind it. It is a passion project of mine and I love to share helpful information with you to make a positive impact on the world and society. However, it's a project in that I invest a lot of time and also quite some money. Eventually, my dream is to one day turn this passion project into my full-time job and provide even more helpful information. But that's still a long time to go. Stay impactful,Affiliate Disclosure
Why do we add these product links?
What do these affiliate links mean for you?
What do these affiliate links mean for us?
What does this mean for me personally?
One way to reduce human-derived atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions is via carbon sequestration, or the storage of carbon in various reservoirs. Our forests and oceans already store carbon naturally but partnered with carbon offsets, carbon sequestration could have a greater impact. So, we had to ask: What are carbon sequestration offsets really, and could they help us mitigate climate change?
Carbon sequestration offsets are a specific type of carbon offset that stores CO2 in our carbon sinks (forests, oceans, geological formations). Sequestration projects reduce CO2 emissions by supporting projects that reinforce our carbon sinks, which absorb massive amounts of our emissions every year.
Keep reading to find out all about what carbon sequestration offsets are, how they work, how effective and efficient they are, what their pros and cons are, and what the best ones are. At the end of the article, we’ll also share with you how carbon sequestration offsets can help mitigate climate change and what better alternatives to them are.
The Big Picture of Carbon Sequestration Offsets
Carbon offsets are reductions in carbon emissions that are used to compensate for carbon emissions occurring elsewhere. They are measured in tons of carbon dioxide (CO2) equivalents and are bought and sold through international brokers, online retailers, and trading platforms on what is known as the global carbon offset market.
“Carbon Offset: a way for a company or person to reduce the level of carbon dioxide for which they are responsible by paying money to a company that works to reduce the total amount produced in the world, for example by reforestation”
Oxford Dictionary
Carbon sequestration refers to the elimination of carbon from our atmosphere via its storage in terrestrial, marine, or geological reservoirs. It is one way to mitigate the adverse effects of CO2 emissions that occur once they enter our atmosphere.
“Carbon Sequestration: the process of storing carbon dioxide that has been collected and removed from the atmosphere, in solid or liquid form”
Oxford Dictionary
Carbon sequestration is also commonly referred to as carbon capture and storage/sequestration because carbon capture is the first step in the sequestration process.
What are carbon sequestration offsets | Carbon sequestration offsets are a specific type of carbon offset that focuses on the long-term storage of captured or removed carbon in plants, soils, geologic formations, and the ocean. |
How do carbon sequestration offsets work | Carbon sequestration projects reduce CO2 emissions by supporting projects that reinforce our forest and marine carbon sinks, which are capable of absorbing massive amounts of our emissions. |
How effective and efficient are carbon sequestration offsets | Effectiveness: Depending on the type of sequestration, carbon sequestration offsets can permanently and quickly remove carbon from the atmosphere while reinforcing our carbon sinks. However, they also do not reduce your own carbon emissions, which can lead to greenwashing. Efficiency: Depending on the type of sequestration, carbon sequestration offsets can be cost-effective, avoid carbon emissions after their project lifespan, and have low rates of carbon re-emission. However, they also may also lack permanence, and may not yet be scaled to compensate for our global emissions. |
What are the 6 pros of carbon sequestration offsets | 1. Carbon sequestration offsets can be permanent 2. Carbon sequestration offsets can reduce CO2 emissions quickly 3. Carbon sequestration offsets can be cost-effective 4. Carbon sequestration offsets can reinforce our carbon sinks 5. Carbon sequestration offsets can have low rates of carbon re-emission 6. Carbon sequestration offsets allow us to reduce carbon emissions in ways we wouldn’t be able to accomplish individually |
What are the 6 cons of carbon sequestration offsets | 1. Carbon sequestration offsets can lack permanence 2. Carbon sequestration offsets can be relatively expensive 3. Carbon sequestration offsets may not yet be scaled to compensate for our global emissions 4. Carbon sequestration offsets can negatively alter ecosystems 5. Carbon sequestration offsets can be difficult to standardize, verify, and monitor 6. Carbon sequestration offsets do not reduce your own carbon emissions |
What are the best carbon sequestration offsets | The best carbon sequestration offsets are offered by Climeworks, The Arbor Day Foundation, REDD.plus, and SeaTrees which involve reforestation, afforestation, REDD+, blue carbon, carbon mineralization, and direct carbon/air capture. |
How can carbon sequestration offsets help mitigate climate change | Carbon sequestration can specifically help mitigate climate change because it eliminates atmospheric carbon, which when emitted, can remain in our atmosphere for a long period of time. |
What Are Carbon Sequestration Offsets
Carbon sequestration is defined as the long-term storage of captured or removed carbon in plants, soils, geologic formations, and the ocean.
“Carbon Sequestration: the process of storing carbon dioxide that has been collected and removed from the atmosphere, in solid or liquid form”
Oxford Dictionary
Some of the most common carbon sequestration offset projects include:
- Direct Carbon/Air Capture
- Reforestation
- Afforestation
- Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+)
- Blue Carbon
- Carbon Mineralization
- Agriculture
How Do Carbon Sequestration Offsets Work
Carbon sequestration projects reduce CO2 emissions by supporting projects that reinforce our forest and marine carbon sinks, which are capable of absorbing massive amounts of our emissions.
Carbon sequestration can occur via two main methods:
- Artificial carbon sequestration: The result of carbon capture. The captured carbon is compressed into a liquid and transported via pipeline, ship, or tanker before being pumped deep underground, often at depths of 1 kilometer (0.6 miles), and sequestered in depleted oil reserves, coalbeds, or saline aquifers.
- Biological carbon sequestration: Carbon storage in vegetation (forests), soils, and oceans, which are commonly referred to as our carbon sinks.
Trees, marine ecosystems, and underground geological reservoirs are the most common storage places. Sequestering carbon in those places is one way to mitigate the adverse effects of CO2 emissions that occur once they enter our atmosphere.
How Effective and Efficient Are Carbon Sequestration Offsets
In terms of effectiveness, carbon sequestration offsets can permanently remove carbon from the atmosphere, can remove emissions quickly, and can reinforce our carbon sinks, depending on the type of sequestration. However, they do not reduce your own carbon emissions, which can lead to greenwashing.
In terms of efficiency, carbon sequestration offsets can be cost-effective, can continue to avoid carbon emissions after their project lifespan, and have low rates of carbon re-emission, depending on the type of sequestration. However, they may also lack permanence, and may not yet be scaled to compensate for our global emissions.
Carbon sequestration offsets are effective at mitigating climate change because:
- Direct carbon/air capture (DCC/DAC), carbon mineralization, and biochar offsets remove carbon from the atmosphere and store it permanently in underground geological reservoirs.
- DCC/DAC, carbon mineralization, REDD+, and some blue carbon and agricultural offsets reduce emissions quicker than other nature-based solutions.
- Nature-based solutions such as reforestation, afforestation, REDD+, blue carbon, and agroforestry store carbon in forests, soils, and oceans, commonly called our carbon sinks.
However, carbon sequestration offsets can also lack effectiveness because they do not reduce your own carbon emissions, which can lead to greenwashing. This occurs when emissions are only offset and not reduced from the source, and the consumer is deceived into thinking they are offsetting their emissions but in reality, they are not.
Carbon sequestration offsets are efficient at reducing CO2 emissions because:
- Reforestation, afforestation, REDD+, blue carbon, and agricultural offsets are some of the most cost-effective methods of carbon emission reduction, averaging less than $50 per ton of CO2 offset.
- Trees continue absorbing carbon long after they mature, which means reforestation, afforestation, and mangrove blue carbon projects can continue to reduce carbon emissions long after the trees have been planted.
- DCC/DAC offsets can have low rates of carbon re-emission when plants are operated by low-carbon electricity. And carbon mineralization offsets store carbon permanently, even if rocks are broken.
However, carbon sequestration offsets can also lack efficiency because:
- Nature-based carbon sequestration solutions such as reforestation, afforestation, REDD+, blue carbon, and agroforestry can lack permanence because carbon storage is reversible.
- DCC/DAC, carbon mineralization, blue carbon, and agricultural offsets are not scaled enough to keep pace with our global carbon emissions due to a lack of technology and few companies engaged in the practices.
What Are The 6 Pros and 6 Cons of Carbon Sequestration Offsets
Carbon sequestration offsets can be permanent, immediate, cost-effective, have low rates of carbon re-emission, and reinforce our carbon sinks depending on the specific type of offset. They also allow us to reduce carbon emissions in ways we wouldn’t be able to accomplish individually.
However, carbon sequestration offsets can lack permanence, can be relatively expensive, may not be scaled to compensate for our global emissions, can negatively alter ecosystems, and can be difficult to standardize, verify, and monitor, depending on the specific type of offset. They also do not reduce your own carbon emissions, which can lead to greenwashing.
What Are the 6 Pros of Carbon Sequestration Offsets
Carbon sequestration offsets have various pros that make them effective at reducing carbon emissions.
6 Pros of Carbon Sequestration Offsets | Quick Facts |
#1: Carbon sequestration offsets can be permanent | Direct carbon/air capture (DCC/DAC) and carbon mineralization offsets permanently remove carbon from the atmosphere |
#2: Carbon sequestration offsets can reduce CO2 emissions quickly | DCC/DAC, carbon mineralization, REDD+, and some blue carbon offsets reduce emissions quicker than other nature-based solutions. |
#3: Carbon sequestration offsets can be cost-effective | Reforestation, afforestation, REDD+, and blue carbon offsets are some of the most cost-effective methods of carbon emission reduction. |
#4: Carbon sequestration offsets can reinforce our carbon sinks | Reforestation, afforestation, REDD+, and blue carbon offsets reinforce our terrestrial and marine carbon sinks, which are capable of absorbing billions of tons of CO2 every year. |
#5: Carbon sequestration offsets can have low rates of carbon re-emission | DCC/DAC and carbon mineralization processes have a low rate of carbon re-emission, making them effective at removing carbon. |
#6: Carbon sequestration offsets allow us to reduce carbon emissions in ways we wouldn’t be able to accomplish individually | Carbon sequestration offsets allow us to reduce emissions from activities where sustainable alternatives are not yet widely available. |
What Are the 6 Cons of Carbon Sequestration Offsets
Understanding the drawbacks of carbon sequestration offsets is important in order to effectively mitigate climate change.
6 Cons of Carbon Sequestration Offsets | Quick Facts |
#1: Carbon sequestration offsets can lack permanence | Reforestation, afforestation, REDD+, and blue carbon offsets can lack permanence because they are reversible, nature-based solutions. |
#2: Carbon sequestration offsets can be relatively expensive | DCC/DAC and carbon mineralization are some of the more expensive methods of carbon removal. With further research, development, and funding, this could decrease in coming years. |
#3: Carbon sequestration offsets may not yet be scaled to compensate for our global emissions | DCC/DAC, carbon mineralization, and blue carbon offsets are not yet scaled to keep pace with our global carbon emissions due to various technological and financial barriers. |
#4: Carbon sequestration offsets can negatively alter ecosystems | Afforestation and carbon mineralization offsets can negatively alter ecosystems if projects are not planned and sited properly. |
#5: Carbon sequestration offsets can be difficult to standardize, verify, and monitor | Blue carbon and agricultural carbon offsets can be difficult to standardize, verify, and monitor because there different methodologies for assessing them. |
#6: Carbon sequestration offsets do not reduce your own carbon emissions | If emissions are only offset and not reduced from the source, this could lead to greenwashing, when the consumer is deceived into thinking they are offsetting their emissions but in reality, they are not. |
How Could You Offset Your Own Carbon Footprint With Carbon Sequestration Offsets
The market for carbon offsets was small in the year 2000, but by 2010 it had already grown to represent nearly $10 billion worldwide. The voluntary carbon offset market (VCM) is where everyday consumers can purchase carbon offsets to offset their carbon emissions.
The Ecosystem Marketplace predicts the VCM can grow to $50B by the year 2050. And because carbon sequestration offsets can be effective and efficient at reducing carbon emissions, they are predicted to make up an increasingly larger share of this market.
Carbon Sequestration Offset Company | Quick Facts |
Climeworks | About: Carbon offset purchases support the practice of direct CO2 removal, where specialized machines remove CO2 directly from the air and store it in rock formations underground. Costs: $1.20 per 1kg of CO2 |
The Arbor Day Foundation | About: Carbon offset purchases support afforestation (and reforestation) projects in the Mississippi Alluvial Valley (US), Nicaragua, and Peru. Costs: $40 per 1,000kg of CO2 |
REDD.plus | About: Carbon offset purchases support UNFCCC-verified REDD+ projects around the globe. REDD.plus is a central registry and exchange for REDD+ Result Units, a type of carbon credit. Costs: $16 per ton of CO2 |
SeaTrees | About: Carbon offset purchases support coral reef/kelp forest/watershed restoration as well as mangrove tree planting. Costs: $22 per 1,000kg of CO2 |
Husk | About: Husk converts rice husks into biochar, fertilizers, and biopesticides via smokeless pyrolysis, preventing the re-emission of carbon into the atmosphere. Costs: Husk uses resellers to sell its solutions. Visit Patch’s website to learn more about pricing. |
Novocarbo | About: Novocarbo uses pyrogenic carbon capture and storage, which converts CO2 into regenerative energy and biochar. The biochar can be used as soil, as a replacement for cement, and in regenerative agriculture. Costs: Novocarbo uses resellers (e.g., Puro.earth and Carbonfuture), and costs are determined with these. |
Ecologi | About: Carbon offset purchases support third-party certified reforestation/afforestation carbon offset projects including those in Madagascar, Mozambique, Bolivia, Morocco, Senegal, and Uruguay. Costs: $6.04 per 1,000 kg of CO2 offset |
One Tree Planted | About: Carbon offset purchases support reforestation/afforestation projects including those in the US, Romania, Iceland, and Africa. Costs: $20 per 1,000kg of CO2 |
The Ocean Foundation | About: Carbon offset purchases support the SeaGrass Grow, seagrass planting project. Costs: $20 per 1,000kg of CO2 |
Wildlife Works | About: Carbon offset purchases support third-party certified carbon offset projects including The Kasigau Corridor, Mai Ndombe, and Southern Cardamom REDD+ projects in Kenya, Cambodia, and Colombia respectively. Costs: $20 per ton of CO2 |
Neustark | About: Neustark removes CO2 from the atmosphere and stores it in recycled concrete, and they cut new CO2 emissions by reducing the use of traditional cement. Costs: Costs are determined after initial contact. |
greenSand | About: greenSand uses Olivine rocks, which trap CO2 when they come into contact with water. For every ton of CO2 purchased, greenSand spreads 1 ton of Olivine, which can in turn absorb and permanently store 1 ton of CO2. Costs: $82 per 1,000kg of CO2 |
Vi Agroforestry | About: Vi Agroforestry specializes in poverty reduction and environmental improvement through agroforestry and improved farming practices. Costs: $28 per 1,000kg of CO2 offset |
Terrapass | About: Carbon offset purchases support the reforestation, afforestation, and REDD+ projects in Peru, Canada, Indonesia, Papua New Guinea, and the US. Costs: $16.51-$17.63 per 1,000kg of CO2 |
How Can Carbon Sequestration Offsets Help Mitigate Climate Change
Climate change is a severe and long-term consequence of fossil fuel combustion. Carbon sequestration offsets can help mitigate climate change because they eliminate fossil-fuel-derived carbon from our atmosphere which, if left untreated, can remain there for tens of thousands of years and exacerbate the negative effects of climate change.
How is Climate Change Defined
Climate change is arguably the most severe, long-term global impact of fossil fuel combustion. Every year, approximately 33 billion tons (bt) of CO2 are emitted from burning fossil fuels. The carbon found in fossil fuels reacts with oxygen in the air to produce CO2.
“Climate change: changes in the earth’s weather, including changes in temperature, wind patterns and rainfall, especially the increase in the temperature of the earth’s atmosphere that is caused by the increase of particular gasses, especially carbon dioxide.”
Oxford Dictionary
Atmospheric CO2 fuels climate change, which results in global warming. When CO2 and other air pollutants absorb sunlight and solar radiation in the atmosphere, it traps the heat and acts as an insulator for the planet. Since the Industrial Revolution, Earth’s temperature has risen a little more than 1 degree Celsius (C), or 2 degrees Fahrenheit (F). Between 1880-1980 the global temperature rose by 0.07C every 10 years. This rate has more than doubled since 1981, with a current global annual temperature rise of 0.18C, or 0.32F, for every 10 years.
As outlined in the 2015 Paris Climate Agreement, we must cut current GHG emissions by 50% by 2030 and reach net zero by 2050.
How Do Carbon Offsets Generally Help Mitigate Climate Change
Levels of carbon in our atmosphere that cause climate change have increased due to human emissions since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution in 1750. The global average concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere today registers at over 400 parts per million. Carbon offsets can help prevent these levels from increasing even more.
When you hear the words “carbon offset”, think about the term “compensation”. Essentially, carbon offsets are reductions in GHG emissions that are used to compensate for emissions occurring elsewhere.
Carbon offsets that meet key criteria and verified project standards, are additional and permanent, and are a part of projects that are carried out until the end of their lifespan have the best chance of reducing carbon emissions and therefore reducing climate change.
When we offset CO2 we also slow the rate of global temperature rise, which in turn minimizes the effects of climate change.
How Do Carbon Sequestration Offsets Specifically Help Mitigate Climate Change
Carbon sequestration in general can specifically help mitigate climate change because it eliminates atmospheric carbon, which when emitted, can remain in our atmosphere for a long period of time.
Reforestation, afforestation, and REDD+ offsets specifically help mitigate climate change because they plant more trees, and trees remove CO2 from the air as they grow. By increasing the number of trees on our planet, we increase the amount of carbon they are capable of storing. The more carbon our forests can sequester, the less carbon there is in our atmosphere.
Blue carbon offsets specifically help mitigate climate change because they protect coastal and marine ecosystems, which are capable of absorbing more CO2 per acre than rainforests and at a rate 10x greater.
Direct carbon/air capture and carbon mineralization offsets specifically help mitigate climate change because these methods permanently lock away CO2 for thousands of years with little to no re-emission.
Agricultural carbon offsets such as biochar, agroforestry, avoided grassland conversion, and CH4 capture can specifically help mitigate climate change because they reduce CO2 and CH4 emissions in one of the biggest industries worldwide.
What Are Better Alternatives to Carbon Sequestration Offsets
If used correctly, carbon sequestration offsets can provide environmental, economic, and social benefits beyond reducing carbon emissions. They have the potential to instigate meaningful environmental change and begin to reverse some of the effects of climate change.
However, we can’t let this method be a guilt-free way to reduce carbon emissions. Carbon sequestration offsets must be used in conjunction with direct carbon reduction measures to reduce carbon emissions in the long term.
These reduction measures don’t have to involve drastic changes either. Actions that may seem small can have a big impact because those small changes add up! You can reduce your carbon footprint in three main areas of your life: household, travel, and lifestyle.
Reduce your household carbon footprint:
- Wash with cold water: Washing clothes in cold water could reduce carbon emissions by up to 11 million tons. Approximately 90% of the energy is used to heat the water, so switching to cold saves also saves energy.
- Replace incandescent bulbs with fluorescent bulbs: Fluorescent bulbs use 75% less energy than incandescent ones, saving energy and thus reducing electricity demand and GHG emissions.
Reduce your travel carbon footprint:
- Fly less: Aviation accounts for around 1.9% of global carbon emissions and 2.5% of CO2. Air crafts run on jet gasoline, which is converted to CO2 when burned.
- Walk or bike when possible: The most efficient ways of traveling are walking, bicycling, or taking the train. Using a bike instead of a car can reduce carbon emissions by 75%. These forms of transportation also provide lower levels of air pollution.
Reduce your lifestyle carbon footprint:
- Switch to renewable energy sources: The six most common types of renewable energy are solar, wind, hydro, tidal, geothermal, and biomass energy. They are a substitute for fossil fuels that can reduce the effects of global warming by limiting global carbon emissions and other pollutants.
- Recycle: Recycling uses less energy and deposits less waste in landfills. Less manufacturing and transportation energy costs means fewer carbon emissions generated. Less waste in landfills means less CH4 is generated.
- Switch from single-use to sustainable products: Reusing products avoids resource extraction, reduces energy use, reduces waste generation, and can prevent littering.
- Eat less meat and dairy: Meat and dairy account for 14.5% of global GHG emissions, with beef and lamb being the most carbon-intensive. Globally, we consume much more meat than is considered sustainable, and switching to a vegan or vegetarian diet could reduce emissions.
- Take shorter showers: Approximately 1.2 trillion gallons of water are used each year in the United States just for showering purposes, and showering takes up about 17% of residential water usage. The amount of water consumed and the energy cost of that consumption are directly related. The less water we use the less energy we use. And the less energy we use, the less of a negative impact we have on the environment.
Because carbon sequestration offsets are an indirect and not a direct way of reducing emissions, they alone will not be enough to reduce global carbon emissions significantly. Direct measures of emission sequestration, such as reducing individual energy use and consumption, are better alternatives to carbon sequestration offsets.
Final Thoughts
Carbon sequestration offsets help reduce carbon emissions by taking captured/removed carbon and storing it in terrestrial, marine, and underground reservoirs. Their effectiveness and efficiency highly depend on the type of sequestration.
Direct carbon/air capture and carbon mineralization offsets permanently remove CO2 quickly with low rates of carbon re-emission. Reforestation, afforestation, REDD+, and blue carbon offsets reinforce our carbon sinks, reduce emissions after project lifespans, and are cost-effective.
The top carbon sequestration offsets are those offered by companies whose sequestration projects are verified by recognized standards. But although carbon offsets can instigate meaningful change, they should not be seen as the only solution to climate change. In the long term, they fail to reduce CO2 enough to mitigate climate change for future generations.
When used in conjunction with direct CO2 reduction measures, carbon offsets can be much more effective. We should reduce our own carbon footprint as much as possible first, and only then choose carbon sequestration offsets.
Stay impactful,
Sources
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Offsets and RECs -What’s the Difference?
- Britannica: Carbon Offset
- David Suzuki Foundation: Are carbon offsets the answer to climate-altering flights?
- The Economist: Carbon capture and storage
- Britannica: Carbon Sequestration
- Impactful Ninja: What Are Direct Carbon Capture Offsets and How Do They Work
- Impactful Ninja: What Are Tree Planting Carbon Offsets and How Do They Work
- Impactful Ninja: What Are Afforestation Carbon Offsets and How Do They Work
- Impactful Ninja: What Are REDD+ Carbon Offsets and How Do They Work
- Impactful Ninja: What Are Blue Carbon Offsets and How Do They Work
- Impactful Ninja: What Are Carbon Mineralization Offsets and How Do They Work
- The London School of Economics and Political Science: What is carbon capture, usage and storage (CCUS)?
- University of California, Davis: What is Carbon Sequestration and How Does it Work?
- ClientEarth: What is a carbon sink?
- Impactful Ninja: What Are Carbon Sequestration Offsets and How Do They Work? The Big Picture
- Carbfix: Homepage
- Carbfix: Protecting Our Climate by Turning CO2 Into Stone
- Edie: Carbon offsetting – How are businesses avoiding greenwashing on the road to net-zero?
- greenSand: Olivine Research & Evidence
- The Institute for Carbon Removal Law and Policy: Nature-Based Solutions
- American University: Fact Sheet – Enhanced Mineralization
- Impactful Ninja: How Effective and Efficient Are Carbon Sequestration Offsets? Here Are the Facts
- Impactful Ninja: Carbon Sequestration Offsets: All 6 Pros and 6 Cons Explained
- Carbon Offset Guide: Voluntary Offset Programs
- Ecosystem Marketplace: Voluntary Carbon Markets Top $1 Billion in 2021 with Newly Reported Trades
- Climeworks: Homepage
- The Arbor Day Foundation: Homepage
- REDD.plus: Homepage
- SeaTrees: Homepage
- Novocarbo: Homepage
- Ecologi: Homepage
- One Tree Planted: Homepage
- The Ocean Foundation: Homepage
- Wildlife Works: Homepage
- Neustark: Homepage
- greenSand: Homepage
- Terrapass: Homepage
- World Nuclear Association: Carbon Emissions from Electricity
- Natural Resources Defense Council: Global Warming 101
- myclimate: What does “net zero emissions” mean?
- United Nations Convention Framework on Climate Change: The Paris Agreement
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration: Climate Change – Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide
- Terrapass: Carbon Offset Projects
- Carbon Offset Guide: Additionality
- American University: Fact Sheet – Carbon Removal
- The Ocean Foundation: Reduce Your Carbon Footprint
- Energy Information Administration: Renewable Energy Explained
- Energy Star: Compact Fluorescent Light Bulbs (CFLs) and Mercury
- Our World in Data: Where in the world do people have the highest CO2 emissions from flying?
- Zero Waste Europe: Reusable vs Single Use Packaging
- Carbonbrief: Interactive – What is the climate impact of eating meat and dairy?
- Stop Waste: Recycling and Climate Protection
- Impactful Ninja: Is Taking Long Showers Bad for the Environment?
- United States Environmental Protection Agency: Showerheads
- Impactful Ninja: 4 Main Reasons Why Reducing Your Carbon Footprint is Important